W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-id@w3.org > June 2005

Re: Implementation report on xml:id

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 21:55:11 +0200
Message-ID: <6110178895.20050624215511@w3.org>
To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Cc: public-xml-id@w3.org

On Friday, June 24, 2005, 9:16:29 PM, Norman wrote:

NW> / Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> was heard to say:
NW> | I do not consider this an adequate implementation report.  Please state
NW> | which tests were passed by each implementation, and please state what
NW> | the pass or fail criteria are for each test.

NW> Hi Chris,

NW> The implementation report has been updated:

NW>   http://www.w3.org/XML/2005/01/xml-id-implementation.html

NW> Please take a look and let us know if you are still unsatisfied with
NW> it.

The implementation report is now very clear and informative regarding
which tests are passed or failed by a given implementation. This deals
very well with my first point.

Turning to the second point, its not entirely clear what the pass or
failure criteria are for each test

http://www.w3.org/XML/2005/01/xml-id/

says what is tested but not what must be done to pass... ah, is

http://www.w3.org/XML/2005/01/xml-id/test-suite.xml

the documentation? Yes, I see <result> and <notes> elements which seem
to document this. Its not super clear (when one is already on a page
called "The xml:id test suite", following a link with the anchor text
"test suite" is not an obvious thing to do to find out how to judge
whether a test is passed or not) but it is documented. Therefore my
second point has been dealt with.

In http://www.w3.org/XML/2005/01/xml-id/ is it possible to generate it
such that the notes field is also included?



-- 
 Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
 Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead
Received on Friday, 24 June 2005 19:55:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:39 GMT