Norman Walsh wrote: > XML Schema authors are encouraged to use xml:id attributes when > providing identifiers for elements declared in their schemas. Note > that this can most easily be accomplished by importing the schema > for the XML namespace and using the attribute declaration it > contains. That looks fine. The one thing that I do want to avoid is the situation we have with the XLink schemas. On that side, there is a spec for XLink contents, but no normative schemas, and popularly-used schemas all have issues and problems, such as creating types and attribute groups that do not appear in the specification. A concrete URL of a specific XSD schema would be very useful, as opposed to referencing "the schema for the XML namespace". > The Core WG plans to address the C14N issues, but we don't feel > that such plans need to be in the xml:id specification. Agreed. But sooner is definitely better, since we have lead times for vetting upcoming releases. -- Webb Roberts (webb.roberts@gtri.gatech.edu) Research Scientist, Georgia Tech Research Institute Atlanta, GA 404-385-0181Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2005 20:11:58 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:39 GMT