On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 12:59:54PM -0400, Norman Walsh wrote: > / Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com> was heard to say: > | [P.S. posting from veillard@redhat.com which may differ from the > | address I'm subscribed to for public-xml-core-wg or public-xml-id > | sorry for the potential bounces, Daniel ] > > Thank you, Daniel for helping us better understand the issues involved. > For the purposes of addressing comments made during the CR phase, may > we assume that you are satisified with the resolution of this thread? Me ? Being in the defending camp, sure, but I'm not sure I represent all parties here :-) To answer your question: yes. Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/Received on Friday, 10 June 2005 20:09:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:39 GMT