W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-id@w3.org > June 2005

Re: Requirement 5

From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:57:11 -0400
To: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Cc: public-xml-id@w3.org
Message-id: <87y89ikv4o.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> was heard to say:
| I am now making this a formal comment to which I would request a
| response during disposition of comments:
|
| Requirement 5 of" xml:id Requirements" states, "The solution must not
| inadvertently apply IDness to constructs which are intended not to have it."
|
| Placing the id attribute in the XML namespace, has the effect of
| inadvertently applying IDness to constructs which are intended not
| to have it through the intermediary of canonicalization. I therefore
| believe that the current draft of xml:id does not meet its stated
| requirements, and request that the working group revise the draft so
| that this requirement is satisfied before issuing it as a
| recommendation.

The working group has discussed this issue at great length. It remains
the opinion of the working group that the C14N consequence you
describe is a flaw in C14N and not a problem with the xml:id
specification. For this reason, among others, the WG has no plans to
change the spelling of "xml:id".

Please let us know if you are satisfied with this resolution.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

Received on Friday, 10 June 2005 16:57:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:39 GMT