Hi Daniel, > Nothing in the Namespace in XML spec implies that this binding >is static as you're claiming. Yes it does. The first definition in the recommendation defines a namespace to be a collection of names identified by a URI. If you change the collection of names, you change the namespace. Since the meaning of 'identify' is fairly clear, a different URI must be used to 'identify' the new collection. >> The meaning of 'reserved' is fairly clear. Another specification (such >> as XML canonicalization) should not be making assumptions about future >> registrations into the XMl namespace, since that namespace is reserved. > Amen ! As pointed out to Chris, the meaning of reserved may be clear, and I second your "Amen", but you have not looked at what is reserved because otherwise you wouldn't think it substantiates your point. JohnReceived on Tuesday, 8 February 2005 16:45:12 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:38 GMT