* Norman Walsh wrote: >FWIW, I don't. There's a precedent for using xml: (xml:base, xml:lang, >xml:space). There's no precedent (that I can think of) for taking advantage >of the fact that XML reserves names beginning xml (except maybe >xml-stylesheet). xmlns. >Except user expectations. I think users would find the unqualified >attribute name "xmlid" more confusing than "xml:id". Well, lots of authors consider x.setAttributeNS("http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace", "id", ...) more difficult than x.setAttributeNS(null, "xmlid", ...) or x.setAttribute("xmlid", ...) Evidence can easily be found on any forum that involves namespace discussions. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2005 15:21:04 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:38 GMT