John Boyer wrote: > Or, more appropriately, use Bert's suggestion of the > prefix xmlid, which would then be bound to a *different* > URI than the one associated with XML 1.0. Actually, I thought the suggestion was to use "xmlid" as the *name*, not the prefix. I sort of like that idea. Simple, straight-forward, and doesn't break anything else I can think of. -- Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@metalab.unc.edu XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published! http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/ http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosimReceived on Tuesday, 8 February 2005 12:43:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:38 GMT