W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-id@w3.org > April 2005

Re: xml:id versus xmlid

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 15:35:27 +0000 (UTC)
To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Cc: public-xml-id@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0504261534030.4611@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>

On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Norman Walsh wrote:
>
> / Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> was heard to say:
> |> I think it follows from "The prefix xml is by definition bound to the
> |> namespace name http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace." in the namespaces
> |> recommendation.
> |
> | It's quite clear from the context of that statement that it's referring to
> | bindings in XML documents. It has nothing to say about non-XML contexts such as
> | XPath expressions and Java libraries.
> 
> That's why I said "I think it follows from". I recognize that it's 
> underspecified at the moment.

It isn't the case in, for instance, CSS. There, the "xml" prefix would 
have to be explicitly defined before being used.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 26 April 2005 15:35:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:38 GMT