[closed] Comments by CSS WG on WD-xml-id-20040407

> A brief discussion of the new draft by the CSS working group led to
> the following two comments:
>
> 1. It seems unclear what the processing of xml:id should be in the
> presence of Schemas or DTDs that do not specify that xml:id is of type
> ID. Is that an error? Or do you end up with a case where an element has
> one id in a validating parser scenario and another in a non-validating
> parser scenario?

I believe we have clarified the spec on that point: it is a validity
error.

> 2. We think the test suite for this specification should include tests
> that check that CSS UAs support xml:id interoperably.

I have constructed a test for this purpose.

> Hopefully these comments will be of help for the next version of the
> draft.

Thank you for taking the time to review the draft, we appreciate your
comments.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.