W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-er@w3.org > February 2012

Re: Deployment and media types

From: Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:39:22 -0500
To: Noah Mendelsohn <nrm@arcanedomain.com>
Cc: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>, Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, public-xml-er@w3.org
Message-ID: <1330547962.31694.279.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 15:12 -0500, Noah Mendelsohn wrote:

> I think Mark B. would be correct in his concern if we start advertising any 
> non-XML content as "conforming",

Right. Hence my wanting something in the charter requiring that an
"ER-XML processor" (whatever that is) have a way to inform users
(whatever they are) that the input was not (or may not have been)
conforming XML.

This is also why it's Error Recovery and not XML 5.

> Otherwise, I think we can leave RFC 3023 unchanged,
+1

Liam


-- 
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 20:41:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 29 February 2012 20:41:40 GMT