W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-er@w3.org > February 2012

Re: Intent of ER-XML

From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:07:26 +0100
Message-ID: <4F4B9C2E.5090400@kosek.cz>
To: David Lee <David.Lee@marklogic.com>
CC: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>, "public-xml-er@w3.org" <public-xml-er@w3.org>
On 27.2.2012 15:45, David Lee wrote:
> "> it's web technology we're doing so we already knew that ;)"
> There's another hidden assumption I missed.
> Is XML-EHR  only for "web technology" ?

Certainly not, but Web is the place where it makes most sense to use it.
Web browser should do somethings reasonable with illformed XHTML or Atom
feed and having support for XML-ER in browsers would mean that all
browsers can recover from errors in the same way.

But there is nothing which can stop you from using XML-ER when
processing incoming invoice in UBL. But personally I wouldn't recommend
it for such use-cases.


  Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz      http://xmlguru.cz
       Professional XML consulting and training services
  DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
 OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member

Received on Monday, 27 February 2012 15:07:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:47:26 UTC