- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 11:18:18 -0600
- To: public-xml-er@w3.org
On 2/20/2012 9:17 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:06:37 +0100, David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk> > wrote: >> which is compatible with XML 1.1 but not 1.0, I suppose at some point >> (not today probably:-) we need to take a decision on what >> compatibility with xml means. > > Compatibility means that conforming XML 1.0 input does not change. > Whether all non-conforming XML 1.0 input remains non-conforming is the > question we have to address at some point I suppose, but it seems > pretty clear that treating control characters the same way as HTML and > XML 1.1 do is a win. +1 -- Shane McCarron Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc. +1 763 786 8160 x120
Received on Monday, 20 February 2012 17:18:46 UTC