W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > April 2016

Re: Clarify that fragid support is optional when parse=text

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 16:25:47 +0100
To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5b4manxedg.fsf@troutbeck.inf.ed.ac.uk>
Norman Walsh writes:

> Paul Grosso <paul@paulgrosso.name> writes:
>> I think that works for me as long as we agree that your statement:
>>  It is a recoverable error if an implementation does not support
>>  fragment identifiers on the resource type being included.
>> does not contradict the requirement (per the Conformance section)
>> that if the fragid is an XPointer Framework or XPointer element()
>> scheme, it must be supported.
> Aaah. I think I should finesse it a bit. I wasn’t thinking of not
> recognizing XML, but the way that’s worded…

I agree with Paul on this.  Won't it work to 

  a) move the new text further down;

  b) change it to read

  It is a recoverable error if an implementation does not support the
  type of fragment identifier specified for use on a non-XML-typed
  resource, or does not support a form of XPointer fragment identifier
  other than those required by the definition of *acquired infoset*.

I've included a slight change of substance (from fragid to _type_ of
fragid) -- I won't die in a ditch over that part.

       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Wednesday, 27 April 2016 15:27:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 27 April 2016 15:27:31 UTC