- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 16:12:11 +0100
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Norman Walsh writes:
> Paul Grosso <paul@paulgrosso.name> writes:
>> Well, I think it's still a valid test. Assuming no implementation
>> recognizes the value "xtext", and given that the xinclude element
>> has no fallback, the result should (still) be a fatal error, right?
>
> Yeah. Fair point. My implementation-defined behavior was to fallback
> to parse=xml, but that¢s quite easily arguably incorrect.
I'm happy with the other proposed change, and you two seem to have
settled this one.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Wednesday, 27 April 2016 15:14:03 UTC