- From: Paul Grosso <paul@paulgrosso.name>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 10:19:06 -0500
- To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <5419A66A.80103@paulgrosso.name>
On 2014-09-16 14:19, David Ezell wrote: > > Folks: > > I have to miss tomorrow, too. However, Loren and I did meet shortly > after our last meeting, and we made progress on our action. > > As it turns out (thanks to Loren) I was wrong about worrying about > Bugzilla. The actual errata are in the following document, graciously > provided by MSM: > > https://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.errata-2012.html > > > I don’t believe there are errata for datatypes. > > It would be good for Core to review this document. I believe that > there are normative changes, but I don’t think they’re >breaking< changes. > Yes, as a WG we came to all these conclusions months ago, and we decided we would just publish the document at https://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.errata-2012.html pretty much as is. Hence the current actions for you two to (1) confirm that none of the changes will require new implementations, and (2) figure out how to push that document through the publication chain. That's basically where we've been for a long time now. paul > Also, the following document has Bugzilla views of issues discussed > but not closed: > > http://www.w3.org/XML/XMLSchema/v1.1/1e/errata.html#Errata1 > > For now, I think Loren and I agree that XML Core should consider > including the items already integrated in the first document above for > the purposes of 2e. > > Best regards, > > David > > *From:*Loren Cahlander [mailto:loren.cahlander@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 16, 2014 2:39 PM > *To:* Paul Grosso > *Cc:* core > *Subject:* Re: Agenda for XML Core WG telcon of 2014 September 17 > > I need to send my regrets for tomorrow. > > I will have my review of the xsd errata completed by Friday. > > My proxy to the chair. > > Loren > > Sent from my iPad > > > On Sep 15, 2014, at 10:18 AM, Paul Grosso <paul@paulgrosso.name > <mailto:paul@paulgrosso.name>> wrote: > > We have an XML Core WG phone call scheduled for Wednesday, > September 17, from > 08:30-09:00 Pacific time aka > 11:30-12:00 Eastern time aka > 15:30-16:00 UTC > 16:30-17:00 in Ireland and the UK > 17:30-18:00 in middle (most of) Europe > on the Zakim W3C Bridge, +1 617 761 6200, passcode 9652#. > We also use IRC channel #xmlcore on irc.w3.org > <http://irc.w3.org>:6665 . > > > See the XML Core group page [1] for pointers to current documents > and other information. If you have additions to the agenda, please > email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon. > > Please also review our group page's task list [2] for accuracy and > completeness and be prepared to amend if necessary and accept it > at the beginning of the call. > > > Agenda > ====== > 1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and > the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments, > or corrections ready by the beginning of the call). > > > 2. Miscellaneous administrivia and document reviews. > > XML Potential Errata > -------------------- > Comment that “or by the Byte Order Mark” is lacking in section 4.3.3: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2013OctDec/0002 > > Comment that an entity cannot “begin” with a BOM as suggested in > section 4.3.3: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2013OctDec/0003 > > ACTION to John and Henry: Review and comment on the above two comments > on the discussion of BOMs in section 4.3.3 of the XML spec. > > ---- > > Comment about documents with an "empty DTD": > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2014Jan/thread#msg8 > and > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2014JanMar/ > > Henry suggests we could probably make the XML spec clearer here; > see also his comments at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2014JanMar/0004 > > Paul sent the WG response at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2014JanMar/0005 > and there was more back from the commentor at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2014JanMar/ > > ACTION to Henry: Read the post-February 6 email at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-editor/2014JanMar/ > and let us know what you think we should do. > > > Submitting XML Schema 1.1 to ISO > -------------------------------- > See also > https://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-schema > > We have decided we will first publish XML Schema 1.1 2E (with > approved errata). After that, we would send XML Schema 1.1 2E > (only) to ISO. > > Loren has offered to do the editorial duties, and David > talked to CMSMCQ about getting some more help in the details. > > It looks like there are 3 bugs for Structures, none for Datatypes, > but after checking with Michael, he found > https://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.errata-2012.html > which shows 8 errata items whereas bugzilla shows only 3. > > We discussed > https://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.errata-2012.html > > Henry figures we can just publish this document. > > Loren believes the latest document includes everything, > so the next step is to push it through the tool chain, > but that make take help from Henry or Michael. Loren > will try to contact Michael again. > > We will need a diff (or list of changes) and a test suite. > Loren says the diff is already available. > > We need to see if any of the changes are normative. > It appears that none of the changes require a chance > in the test suite. > > ACTION to Loren and David: Check if any changes are normative > and/or would require a change to the test suite (and that aren't > already supported by implementations). > > ACTION to Loren: Check that he can run the build. > > > 3. XML Test Suite. > > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-test-suite > > > 4. LEIRIs--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#leiri > > We have planned to issue the following spec editions referencing > LEIRIs (and any outstanding errata): > > * XML 1.0 6th Edition (John to be editor) > * XML 1.1 3rd Edition (John to be editor) > * XInclude 3rd Edition (Paul to be editor) > > but all this is on hold awaiting resolution of IRIbis. > > > 5. XInclude 1.1--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude > > On 2012 February 14, we published > XInclude 1.1 Requirement and Use Cases > http://www.w3.org/TR/xinclude-11-requirements/ > > On 9 October 2012, we published our FPWD of XInclude 1.1 at > http://www.w3.org/XML/2012/10/WD-xinclude-11-20121009/ > > On 15 January 2013, we published our (first) Last Call of > XInclude 1.1 at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-xinclude-11-20130115/ > and Paul sent the transition announcement at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2013Jan/0012 > (also cc-ing the chairs mailing list). > > On 2013 October 8, we published the XInclude 1.1 CR at > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/CR-xinclude-11-20131008/ > > > > Norm reports that Michael Kay's code just accesses Xerces code, > > so Norm might have to work with Xerces. > > > > DV reports that he is busy and so cannot commit to a deadline > > for adding XInclude 1.1 support to libxml. > > > > ACTION to Norm: Continue to work toward getting XInclude 1.1 > > implementations and document them in our implementation report. > > > > Note also the desire for another test case for the XInclude test suite per > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2014Apr/0000 > > Norm may see if he knows anyone still working on Xerces. > > > > Norm is planning to write a SAX filter to implement XInclude 1.1. > > He believes this will lead to a way for using XInclude 1.1 with > > Saxon's XSLT processor and most any other Java based tool. > > > > Norm raised an issue about xml:base at > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2014Sep/0004 > > wherein he concluded: > > > > We could say that xml:base and xml:lang aren't > > copied because there are separate controls for them. > > > > Another option is to say that if xml:base is copied, > > the absolute base URI is used as the attribute's value. > > There was some follow up discussion on the list. > > > 6. MicroXML > > MicroXML is not in our new charter, but we can discuss it. > We will leave this as an ongoing item in our standing agenda. > > > paul > > [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core > [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks > [3] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2014Jun/0006 <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2014Mar/0006> > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This electronic message, including attachments, is intended only for > the use of the individual or company named above or to which it is > addressed. The information contained in this message shall be > considered confidential and proprietary, and may include confidential > work product. If you are not the intended recipient, please be aware > that any unauthorized use, dissemination, distribution or copying of > this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email > in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and > deleting this email immediately.
Received on Wednesday, 17 September 2014 15:19:39 UTC