W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > February 2012

Re: Transition Request: First Public Working Group Note for XInclude 1.1 Requirement and Use Cases

From: Paul Grosso <paul@paulgrosso.name>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:54:41 -0600
Message-ID: <4F343291.7070005@paulgrosso.name>
To: liam@w3.org
CC: core <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>, Philipp Hoschka <ph@w3.org>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
On 2012-02-09 14:44, Liam R E Quin wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 11:34 -0600, Paul Grosso wrote:
>> The XML Core WG requests transition of
>>
>> XInclude 1.1 Requirement and Use Cases
>>
>> currently staged at
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/XML/2012/01/xinclude-11-requirements/staging/2012-02/
>
> The status section is missing its "unique sentence" to describe why the
> document is being published - e.g. see
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-media-accessibility-reqs-20120103/
>
> A more minimal example:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xproc-requirements-20060411/

I don't understand.

Which sentence in
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xproc-requirements-20060411/
is the "unique sentence" to which you refer?

If I added the sentence in the Abstract to the SotD,
that would be a "unique sentence" describing why the
document is being published, but why should I repeat
the abstract?

paul
Received on Thursday, 9 February 2012 20:55:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 9 February 2012 20:55:10 GMT