RE: [closed] Request for edit-in-place to XPointer Framework

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Denis Ah-Kang
> Sent: Monday, 2011 October 24 10:37
> To: Grosso, Paul
> Cc: Ian Jacobs; webreq@w3.org; public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: [closed] Request for edit-in-place to XPointer Framework
> 
> Paul,
> 
> Indeed, we decided not to modify
> http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/W3C-REC.css for the moment.

That's fine.

> The difference of style between the html and xml comes from:
> [[
> <div id="notice-201110XX" style="border: solid black 1px; padding:
> 0.5em; background: #FFB;"> [...] </div>
> ]]
> which is what you requested.
> I removed it and added the style to <p> instead. It should now be ok.

Yep, excellent, thanks.

paul

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Denis
> 
> 
> On 24/10/11 16:16, Grosso, Paul wrote:
> > Thanks.
> >
> > I note that the CSS wasn't updated so that the XML version
> > doesn't have the same style for this paragraph.  That isn't
> > important to me, but I just wondered if that was what was
> > decided to do.
> >
> > paul
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Denis Ah-Kang [mailto:denis@w3.org]
> >> Sent: Monday, 2011 October 24 2:14
> >> To: Grosso, Paul
> >> Cc: Ian Jacobs; webreq@w3.org; public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> >> Subject: [closed] Request for edit-in-place to XPointer Framework
> >>
> >> Hi Paul,
> >>
> >> The document has been updated.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Denis
> >>
> >> On 20/10/11 23:47, Grosso, Paul wrote:
> >>> Dear Webreq,
> >>>
> >>> Please see the below message for context and then the rest
> >>> of this message for the actual request.
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Ian Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org]
> >>>> Sent: Wednesday, 2011 October 19 11:57
> >>>> To: Grosso, Paul
> >>>> Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> >>>> Subject: Re: XPointer Framework doesn't reference the XPointer
> >>> Registry
> >>>>
> >>>> On 19 Oct 2011, at 11:46 AM, Grosso, Paul wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Ian,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It has been pointed out [1] that the XPointer Framework Rec [2]
> >>>>> has no reference to the XPointer Registry [3].  This isn't
> >>>>> really surprising given that the registry didn't exist when
> >>>>> the Rec came out, but it has been said that people now expect
> >>>>> the XPointer Framework spec to have such a reference.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The XML Core WG is loath to reopen the XPointer Framework Rec
> >>>>> (note that it was never our document, it was produced by the
> >>>>> now closed XLink WG), and we are wondering if it would be
> possible
> >>>>> to edit the spec in place to add a reference to the XPointer
> >>> Registry
> >>>>> from the SOTD of the Rec.
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Paul,
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes, we can do that. Please propose text on webreq@w3.org and we
> >> will
> >>>> do something like this:
> >>>>    http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-DOM-Level-2-Views-20001113/
> >>>>
> >>>> Please cc me as well. Thanks!
> >>>>
> >>>> Ian
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [1]
> >>>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2011Sep/0009
> >>>>> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xptr-framework/
> >>>>> [3] http://www.w3.org/2005/04/xpointer-schemes/
> >>>
> >>> The XML Core WG requests the following edit-in-place (3 files) to
> >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/xptr-framework/:
> >>>
> >>> --------------
> >>>
> >>> HTML: http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-xptr-framework-
> >> 20030325/Overview.var
> >>>
> >>> In the SOTD, in between the</p>   and<p>   in the following:
> >>>
> >>> foundational part of a fragment identifier syntax for the XML
Media
> >>> types.</p><p>Public comments on this Recommendation are welcome.
> >> Please
> >>> send them to
> >>>
> >>> *** please insert (where the two occurrences of XX are replaced by
> >> the
> >>> day's date):
> >>>
> >>> <div id="notice-201110XX" style="border: solid black 1px; padding:
> >>> 0.5em; background: #FFB;">
> >>> <p><strong>Document Status Update 2011-10-XX</strong>: This
> > paragraph
> >> is
> >>> informative. On 18 November 2005
> >>> an<a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/04/xpointer-schemes/">XPointer
> >>> Schemes Registry</a>   was approved for
> >>> public use under the terms of
> >>> an<a
href="http://www.w3.org/2005/04/xpointer-policy.html">XPointer
> >>> Scheme Name Registry Policy</a>.</p>
> >>> </div>
> >>>
> >>> --------------
> >>>
> >>> XML:
> >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-xptr-framework-20030325/xptr-
> >> framework.xml
> >>>
> >>> In the SOTD, in between the</p>   and<p>   in the following:
> >>>
> >>> Media types.</p>
> >>>
> >>> 			<p>Public comments on this Recommendation are
> >>> welcome.  Please send them to
> >>>
> >>> *** please insert (where the two occurrences of XX are replaced by
> >> the
> >>> day's date):
> >>>
> >>> <p id="notice-201110XX" role="edited-in-place"><kw>Document Status
> >>> Update 2011-10-XX</kw>: This paragraph is informative. On 18
> > November
> >>> 2005
> >>> an<loc href="http://www.w3.org/2005/04/xpointer-schemes/">XPointer
> >>> Schemes Registry</loc>   was approved for
> >>> public use under the terms of
> >>> an<loc
> > href="http://www.w3.org/2005/04/xpointer-policy.html">XPointer
> >>> Scheme Name Registry Policy</loc>.</p>
> >>>
> >>> ------------------
> >>>
> >>> XSL first choice: http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/W3C-REC.css
> >>>
> >>> Since this is a W3C-wide concept, the best solution here is to add
> >>> to http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/W3C-REC.css the following CSS:
> >>>
> >>> .edited-in-place {border: solid black 1px; padding: 0.5em;
> >> background:
> >>> #FFB;}
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>>
> >>> XSL alternative:
> >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-xptr-framework-20030325/xmlspec.xsl
> >>>
> >>> If we do not want to edit W3C-REC.css, then edit the local XSLT by
> >>> adding:
> >>>
> >>> .edited-in-place {border: solid black 1px; padding: 0.5em;
> >> background:
> >>> #FFB;}
> >>>
> >>> after
> >>> div.exampleHeader { font-weight: bold;
> >>>                       margin: 4px}
> >>> near the bottom of the template name="css".
> >>>
> >>> -----------------
> >>>
> >>> Let me know if you have any questions or issues.
> >>>
> >>> thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Paul
> >>> for the XML Core WG
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
>

Received on Monday, 24 October 2011 15:43:38 UTC