W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > October 2011

Re: [closed] Request for edit-in-place to XPointer Framework

From: Denis Ah-Kang <denis@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:37:10 +0200
Message-ID: <4EA58626.3090001@w3.org>
To: "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>
CC: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>, webreq@w3.org, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Paul,

Indeed, we decided not to modify 
http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/W3C-REC.css for the moment.
The difference of style between the html and xml comes from:
[[
<div id="notice-201110XX" style="border: solid black 1px; padding: 
0.5em; background: #FFB;"> [...] </div>
]]
which is what you requested.
I removed it and added the style to <p> instead. It should now be ok.

Regards,

Denis


On 24/10/11 16:16, Grosso, Paul wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> I note that the CSS wasn't updated so that the XML version
> doesn't have the same style for this paragraph.  That isn't
> important to me, but I just wondered if that was what was
> decided to do.
>
> paul
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Denis Ah-Kang [mailto:denis@w3.org]
>> Sent: Monday, 2011 October 24 2:14
>> To: Grosso, Paul
>> Cc: Ian Jacobs; webreq@w3.org; public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
>> Subject: [closed] Request for edit-in-place to XPointer Framework
>>
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> The document has been updated.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Denis
>>
>> On 20/10/11 23:47, Grosso, Paul wrote:
>>> Dear Webreq,
>>>
>>> Please see the below message for context and then the rest
>>> of this message for the actual request.
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Ian Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, 2011 October 19 11:57
>>>> To: Grosso, Paul
>>>> Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
>>>> Subject: Re: XPointer Framework doesn't reference the XPointer
>>> Registry
>>>>
>>>> On 19 Oct 2011, at 11:46 AM, Grosso, Paul wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Ian,
>>>>>
>>>>> It has been pointed out [1] that the XPointer Framework Rec [2]
>>>>> has no reference to the XPointer Registry [3].  This isn't
>>>>> really surprising given that the registry didn't exist when
>>>>> the Rec came out, but it has been said that people now expect
>>>>> the XPointer Framework spec to have such a reference.
>>>>>
>>>>> The XML Core WG is loath to reopen the XPointer Framework Rec
>>>>> (note that it was never our document, it was produced by the
>>>>> now closed XLink WG), and we are wondering if it would be possible
>>>>> to edit the spec in place to add a reference to the XPointer
>>> Registry
>>>>> from the SOTD of the Rec.
>>>>
>>>> Hi Paul,
>>>>
>>>> Yes, we can do that. Please propose text on webreq@w3.org and we
>> will
>>>> do something like this:
>>>>    http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-DOM-Level-2-Views-20001113/
>>>>
>>>> Please cc me as well. Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> Ian
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]
>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2011Sep/0009
>>>>> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xptr-framework/
>>>>> [3] http://www.w3.org/2005/04/xpointer-schemes/
>>>
>>> The XML Core WG requests the following edit-in-place (3 files) to
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/xptr-framework/:
>>>
>>> --------------
>>>
>>> HTML: http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-xptr-framework-
>> 20030325/Overview.var
>>>
>>> In the SOTD, in between the</p>   and<p>   in the following:
>>>
>>> foundational part of a fragment identifier syntax for the XML Media
>>> types.</p><p>Public comments on this Recommendation are welcome.
>> Please
>>> send them to
>>>
>>> *** please insert (where the two occurrences of XX are replaced by
>> the
>>> day's date):
>>>
>>> <div id="notice-201110XX" style="border: solid black 1px; padding:
>>> 0.5em; background: #FFB;">
>>> <p><strong>Document Status Update 2011-10-XX</strong>: This
> paragraph
>> is
>>> informative. On 18 November 2005
>>> an<a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/04/xpointer-schemes/">XPointer
>>> Schemes Registry</a>   was approved for
>>> public use under the terms of
>>> an<a href="http://www.w3.org/2005/04/xpointer-policy.html">XPointer
>>> Scheme Name Registry Policy</a>.</p>
>>> </div>
>>>
>>> --------------
>>>
>>> XML:
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-xptr-framework-20030325/xptr-
>> framework.xml
>>>
>>> In the SOTD, in between the</p>   and<p>   in the following:
>>>
>>> Media types.</p>
>>>
>>> 			<p>Public comments on this Recommendation are
>>> welcome.  Please send them to
>>>
>>> *** please insert (where the two occurrences of XX are replaced by
>> the
>>> day's date):
>>>
>>> <p id="notice-201110XX" role="edited-in-place"><kw>Document Status
>>> Update 2011-10-XX</kw>: This paragraph is informative. On 18
> November
>>> 2005
>>> an<loc href="http://www.w3.org/2005/04/xpointer-schemes/">XPointer
>>> Schemes Registry</loc>   was approved for
>>> public use under the terms of
>>> an<loc
> href="http://www.w3.org/2005/04/xpointer-policy.html">XPointer
>>> Scheme Name Registry Policy</loc>.</p>
>>>
>>> ------------------
>>>
>>> XSL first choice: http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/W3C-REC.css
>>>
>>> Since this is a W3C-wide concept, the best solution here is to add
>>> to http://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/W3C-REC.css the following CSS:
>>>
>>> .edited-in-place {border: solid black 1px; padding: 0.5em;
>> background:
>>> #FFB;}
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> XSL alternative:
>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-xptr-framework-20030325/xmlspec.xsl
>>>
>>> If we do not want to edit W3C-REC.css, then edit the local XSLT by
>>> adding:
>>>
>>> .edited-in-place {border: solid black 1px; padding: 0.5em;
>> background:
>>> #FFB;}
>>>
>>> after
>>> div.exampleHeader { font-weight: bold;
>>>                       margin: 4px}
>>> near the bottom of the template name="css".
>>>
>>> -----------------
>>>
>>> Let me know if you have any questions or issues.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> Paul
>>> for the XML Core WG
>>>
>>>
>
>
Received on Monday, 24 October 2011 15:38:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 24 October 2011 15:38:02 GMT