W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > October 2011

RE: XPointer Framework doesn't reference the XPointer Registry

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:31:53 -0400
Message-ID: <9B2DE9094C827E44988F5ADAA6A2C5DA03DBD11D@HQ-MAIL9.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Henry has approved, and I've heard from no one else.

I plan to send this to webreq and Ian by the end of today
if I don't hear any negative comments before then.

paul

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Grosso, Paul
> Sent: Wednesday, 2011 October 19 12:30
> To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: RE: XPointer Framework doesn't reference the XPointer
Registry
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ian Jacobs [mailto:ij@w3.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, 2011 October 19 11:57
> > To: Grosso, Paul
> > Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> > Subject: Re: XPointer Framework doesn't reference the XPointer
> Registry
> >
> > On 19 Oct 2011, at 11:46 AM, Grosso, Paul wrote:
> >
> > > Ian,
> > >
> > > It has been pointed out [1] that the XPointer Framework Rec [2]
> > > has no reference to the XPointer Registry [3].  This isn't
> > > really surprising given that the registry didn't exist when
> > > the Rec came out, but it has been said that people now expect
> > > the XPointer Framework spec to have such a reference.
> > >
> > > The XML Core WG is loath to reopen the XPointer Framework Rec
> > > (note that it was never our document, it was produced by the
> > > now closed XLink WG), and we are wondering if it would be possible
> > > to edit the spec in place to add a reference to the XPointer
> Registry
> > > from the SOTD of the Rec.
> >
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > Yes, we can do that. Please propose text on webreq@w3.org and we
will
> > do something like this:
> >  http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-DOM-Level-2-Views-20001113/
> >
> > Please cc me as well. Thanks!
> 
> WG, please comment on the following proposed text to be added
> (as a yellow-shaded paragraph) within the SOTD just preceding the
> "Public comments on this Recommendation are welcome" paragraph:
> 
> Document Status Update 2011-10-xx: This paragraph is informative.
> On 18 November 2005 an _XPointer Schemes Registry_ was approved for
> public use under the terms of an _XPointer Scheme Name Registry
> Policy_.
> 
> with the two obvious links.
> 
> paul
> 
Received on Thursday, 20 October 2011 13:33:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 20 October 2011 13:33:14 GMT