W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Totally non-conformant JSON hack

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 15:25:10 +0100
To: "David Lee" <dlee@calldei.com>
Cc: "'Norman Walsh'" <ndw@nwalsh.com>, "'XProc Dev'" <xproc-dev@w3.org>, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5bzkh8ncu1.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk>
David Lee writes:

[> Norm Walsh wrote:

>> [ JSON<->XML hack added to Calabash]]

> Not worried about niceness or elegance ... but am concerned about using a
> 'convention' that will have some lifetime.
> Have you considered JSONx which is (has been?) introduced to the public
> domain (after being patented by IBM) ?
> http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/wsdatap/v3r8m1/index.jsp?topic=%2Fx
> i50%2Fconvertingbetweenjsonandjsonx06.htm
>
> Its not my favorite but it has some backing ...
> Then there *is* my favorite  (JXML which has no backing) but does model the
> JSON data model more directly then JSONx
>
> http://xml.calldei.com/JsonXML
>
> Any model that is lossless is fine but It is beginning to concern me the
> proliferation of lossless JSON/XML models.
>
> It would be nice if the community could narrow down rather then proliferate
> on if not a 'standard' atleast a 'common' way of translating JSON to XML in
> a lossless format.

Well, we didn't get interest at XML Prague in standardising
'string<->NCName', but maybe we could get interest in this (larger)
mapping. . .

ht
-- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Monday, 10 October 2011 14:25:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 10 October 2011 14:25:57 GMT