W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > May 2011

Re: Agenda for XML Core WG telcon of 2011 May 4

From: Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 23:09:56 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTimTxg-Wac84hUFuD++bygDA=DSQVA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Dear all,

I must again give my regrets for this telcon due to a customer meeting

Regards,

Mohamed

On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com> wrote:

>
> We have an XML Core WG phone call scheduled for Wednesday,
> May 4, from
>          08:30-09:00 Pacific time aka
>          11:30-12:00 Eastern time aka
>          15:30-16:00 UTC
>          16:30-17:00 in Ireland and the UK
>          17:30-18:00 in middle (most of) Europe
> on the Zakim W3C Bridge, +1 617 761 6200, passcode 9652#.
> We also use IRC channel #xmlcore on irc.w3.org:6665 .
>
> See the XML Core group page [1] for pointers to current documents
> and other information.  If you have additions to the agenda, please
> email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon.
>
> Please also review our group page's task list [2] for accuracy and
> completeness and be prepared to amend if necessary and accept it
> at the beginning of the call.
>
>
> Agenda
> ======
> 1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and
>   the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments,
>   or corrections ready by the beginning of the call).
>
>
> 2. Miscellaneous administrivia and document reviews.
>
> TPAC week
> ---------
> TPAC will be 31 October through 4 November 2011 in Santa Clara
> California.  I think we should plan to have a f2f during this
> week: http://www.w3.org/2011/11/TPAC/ - Meeting Overview page.
>
> Likely attendance:
>
> Probably will:  Paul, Norm, Henry, Laim
> Maybe:  Mohamed
> Most likely won't:  John, Daniel, Jirka, Glenn
>
>
> Name-escaping spec
> ------------------
> Henry sent email at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2011Mar/0018
> asking if we should consider producing a WG Note recommending
> an escaping scheme for turning (mostly) arbitrary strings into
> XML names as a Best Practice.
>
>
> XML Security specs
> ------------------
> The XML Security WG has asked the XML Core WG to review its
> upcoming specs as referenced below, especially:
>
> Canonical XML Version 2.0,
> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/c14n-20/
>
> XML Signature Syntax and Processing Version 2.0,
> http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core-20/
>
> ACTION to Jirka, Norm:  Review the XML Security specs.
>
>
> 3.  XML 1.0--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-errata
>
> We are creating an XML 1.0 6th Edition and XML 1.1 3rd (or
> perhaps 6th) Edition.
>
> ACTION to John:  Update the XML sources for XML 1.0 and 1.1
> to reflect any errata and the LEIRI reference.
>
>
> 4.  XML Test Suite.
>
> See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-test-suite
>
> ACTION to Henry:  Construct a test case for the XML test suite
> issues raised by Frans Englich:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/
>
>
> 5.  Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1--see
>   http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.0
>   and http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.1.
>
>
> 6.  LEIRIs--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#leiri
>
> We had planned to issue the following spec editions referencing LEIRIs:
>
> * XML 1.0 6th Edition
> * XML 1.1 3rd Edition
> * XInclude 3rd Edition
>
> John wonders if we should call the next edition of XML 1.1
> the 6th Edition to match the XML 1.0 spec.  (No decision yet.)
>
> We decided not to touch XLink 1.0.  XLink 1.1 is already leirified.
>
> John will update the XML sources for XML 1.0 and 1.1.
>
> Paul will update the Xinclude source.
>
> Paul, Norm, and Liam are responsible for dealing with pubrules
> and other administrivia.
>
> Our LEIRI WG Note says:
>
>  When [IRIbis is published as an RFC], this specification will be
>  re-issued to reference it in place of the extracts given below.
>
> We are concerned that the XML specs would be normatively referencing
> an RFC through a (non-normative) WG Note, so we're not sure what we
> want to do here.
>
> Furthermore, IRIBis is not moving to RFC quickly.  So we're not
> sure what we should do about issuing new editions.
>
> Recent email from Larry Masinter (one of the authors of IRIbis) at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2011Mar/0022
> doesn't give a time line for IRIBis at this point.
>
> ACTION to Henry:  Ping Larry Masinter (one of the authors of
> IRIbis) for the latest on the IRIbis schedule.
>
>
> 7.  xml:id--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-id
>
>
> 8.  XML Base 2nd Ed--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-base
>
>
> 9.  XLink 1.1--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xlink1.1
>
>
> 10.  XInclude 3rd Ed--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude
>
> We are creating an XInclude 3rd Edition.
>
> ACTION to Paul:  Update the XML sources for Xinclude to reflect
> any errata and the LEIRI reference.
>
>
> 11.  Associating Stylesheets.
>
> See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-ss
>
> AssocSS 2nd Ed is now a Recommendation at
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/REC-xml-stylesheet-20101028/
>
> ACTION to Henry: Update the Errata document at
> http://www.w3.org/1999/06/REC-xml-stylesheet-19990629/errata
>
>
> 12.  xml-model
>
> See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-schemas
>
> This has been published as a WG Note at
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/NOTE-xml-model-20100415/
>
> The ISO ballet has ended.  Some of the comments led us to
> tweak our Note.
>
> Paul prepared an updated draft of the WG Note at
> http://www.w3.org/XML/2011/04/xml-model/xml-model-diff.htm
>
> ACTION to John:  Review the latest xml-model spec at
> http://www.w3.org/XML/2011/04/xml-model/xml-model-diff.htm
>
> Jirka will present our disposition of comments to ISO and
> find out whether they need to do another ballot or not.
>
> ACTION to Jirka:  Find out what the next steps will be
> for ISO's progression of the XML Model spec.
>
> Jirka, Norm suggest we wait a month or two to see if we need
> to do anything else before we publish it as a new edition.
>
> John suggests we publish it now.  Paul isn't sure.
>
> ACTION to Paul:  Consider publishing a new edition of
> our xml-model WG Note (probably no earlier than the
> May 10 timeframe).
>
>
> paul
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core
> [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks
> [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2011Apr/0027
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Monday, 2 May 2011 21:10:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:43 UTC