W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > February 2011

Minutes for XML Core WG telcon of 2011 February 23

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 11:44:44 -0500
Message-ID: <9B2DE9094C827E44988F5ADAA6A2C5DA022AC509@HQ-MAIL9.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Attendees
---------
 Glenn
 Paul 
 Norm
 Liam
 John

[5 organizations (5 with proxies) present out of 9]

Regrets
-------
Daniel

Absent organizations
--------------------
Innovimax
Univ of Edinburgh
Daniel Veillard (with regrets)
Jirka Kosek


Our next telcon will be March 9.  


> 1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and
>    the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments,
>    or corrections ready by the beginning of the call).
> 

Accepted.

> 
> 2. Miscellaneous administrivia and document reviews.
> 
> Charter renewal
> ---------------
> Our new charter is out for AC review.  Please urge your AC rep
> to reply to the review.
> 
> The announcement is at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2011JanMar/0024
> The XML Activity proposal is at http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/10/
> The XML Core WG charter is at
> http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/10/xml-core-charter
> 

Urge your AC rep to complete the XML Activity review.

> 
> XPointer registry and the xpath() scheme
> ----------------------------------------
> Norm sent email requesting re-instatement of the xpath() scheme at
>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xpointer-registry/2010OctDec/
0002
> 
> The email list to track discussions about this registry is
> public-xpointer-registry@w3.org archived at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xpointer-registry/
> 
> ACTION to Liam:  Do something about re-instatement of the xpath()
> scheme.

ACTION to Liam continued.

> 
> XML Processor Profiles review
> -----------------------------
> There is a substantially reworked XML Processing Model WG's
> Last Call Working Draft of "XML processor profiles" at
> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/xml-proc-profiles.html
> 
> ACTION to John, Glenn:  Please re-review the latest version
> of the XML processor profiles last call draft at
> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/docs/xml-proc-profiles.html
> 

ACTION to John, Glenn continued.

> 
> 3.  XML 1.0--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-errata
> 
> We are creating an XML 1.0 6th Edition and XML 1.1 3rd (or
> perhaps 6th) Edition.
> 
> ACTION to John:  Update the XML sources for XML 1.0 and 1.1
> to reflect any errata and the LEIRI reference.
> 

ACTION to John continued.

> 
> 4.  XML Test Suite.
> 
> See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-test-suite
> 
> ACTION to Henry:  Construct a test case for the XML test suite
> issues raised by Frans Englich:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/
> 

ACTION to Henry continued.

> 
> 5.  Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1--see
>    http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.0
>    and http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.1.
> 
> 
> 6.  LEIRIs--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#leiri
> 
> We plan to issue the following spec editions referencing LEIRIs:
> 
> * XML 1.0 6th Edition
> * XML 1.1 3rd Edition
> * XInclude 3rd Edition
> 
> John wonders if we should call the next edition of XML 1.1
> the 6th Edition to match the XML 1.0 spec.  (No decision yet.)
> 
> We decided not to touch XLink 1.0.  XLink 1.1 is already leirified.
> 
> John will update the XML sources for XML 1.0 and 1.1.
> 
> Paul will update the Xinclude source.
> 
> Paul, Norm, and Liam are responsible for dealing with pubrules
> and other administrivia.
> 
> 
> 7.  xml:id--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-id
> 
> 
> 8.  XML Base 2nd Ed--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-base
> 
> 
> 9.  XLink 1.1--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xlink1.1
> 
> 
> 10.  XInclude 3rd Ed--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude
> 
> We are creating an XInclude 3rd Edition.
> 
> ACTION to Paul:  Update the XML sources for Xinclude to reflect
> any errata and the LEIRI reference.
> 

ACTION to Paul continued.

> 
> 11.  Associating Stylesheets.
> 
> See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-ss
> 
> AssocSS 2nd Ed is now a Recommendation at
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/REC-xml-stylesheet-20101028/
> 
> ACTION to Henry: Update the Errata document at
> http://www.w3.org/1999/06/REC-xml-stylesheet-19990629/errata
> 

ACTION to Henry continued.

> 
> 12.  xml-model
> 
> See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-schemas
> 
> This has been published as a WG Note at
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/NOTE-xml-model-20100415/
> 
> We will plan to update our WG Note to reference the ISO spec
> once it is officially available. We will also update our Note
> to reference the Rec version of AssocSS 2nd Ed.
> 
> Jirka reports that the ISO xml-model ballot ends on 2011 April 1st.
> 
> ACTION to Liam:  Look into what it would take to make the ISO
> XML Model standard (once it's an ISO standard) a W3C Recommendation.
> 

Liam reports that someone on the ISO committee would bring it
to W3C and then it would go through usual Rec track.  There is
no way to rubber stamp or fast track such a standard.

John suggests in this case that we just keep it as a WG Note.
General agreement.

> 
> paul
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core
> [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks
> [3]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2011Feb/0004
> 
Received on Wednesday, 23 February 2011 16:45:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 23 February 2011 16:45:41 GMT