W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > February 2011

Minutes for XML Core WG telcon of 2011 February 9

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 12:03:10 -0500
Message-ID: <9B2DE9094C827E44988F5ADAA6A2C5DA0210FCD8@HQ-MAIL9.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Attendees
---------
Glenn
Mohamed
Paul 
Liam
John

[5 organizations (5 with proxies) present out of 9]

Regrets
-------
Norm
Henry
Daniel
Jirka

Absent organizations
--------------------
MarkLogic (with regrets)
Univ of Edinburgh (with regrets)
Daniel Veillard (with regrets)
Jirka Kosek (with regrets)


Our next telcon will be February 23.  


> 1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and
>    the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments,
>    or corrections ready by the beginning of the call).
> 

Accepted

> 
> 2. Miscellaneous administrivia and document reviews.
> 
> Charter renewal
> ---------------
> Charters are pretty much set.  The latest draft is at
> http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/10/xml-core-charter.html
> 
> Our new charter should be going out to the AC for review soon.

The announcement went out Monday evening at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2011JanMar/0024

> 
> ACTION to Liam:  Add some mention of (something like MicroXML)
> to the cover letter of the XML Core Charter review announcement.

This is mentioned in the XML Activity proposal at
http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/10/
Under the XML Core Working Group bullet under "Extension of 
Existing Group Charters" it says:

 XML Core Working Group [charter]: will maintain Core specifications
 of XML; continuing to update related specifications such as
 Associating Stylesheets, and occasionally producing notes and
 guidelines; there may alse be work in the area of MicroXML;
 the Working Group is not currently chartered to produce a
 Recommendation in that area, but may either produce a Note
 or request a charter change in the future. 

> 
> 
> XPointer registry and the xpath() scheme
> ----------------------------------------
> Norm sent email requesting re-instatement of the xpath() scheme at
>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xpointer-registry/2010OctDec/
0002
> 
> The email list to track discussions about this registry is
> public-xpointer-registry@w3.org archived at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xpointer-registry/
> 
> ACTION to Liam:  Do something about re-instatement of the xpath()
> scheme.

ACTION to Liam continued.

> 
> 
> XML Processor Profiles review
> -----------------------------
> We have been asked to review the XML Processing Model WG's
> Last Call Working Draft of "XML processor profiles" at
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-xml-proc-profiles-20101130/
> 
> Glenn wanted to see some rationale/use case for moving from
> one profile to the next.
> 
> ACTION to Glenn:  Send your request for rationales to the
> xproc comments list: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org

ACTION is mooted by Glenn's reconsideration of the issue.

> 
> 
> 3.  XML 1.0--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-errata
> 
> 
> 4.  XML Test Suite.
> 
> See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-test-suite
> 
> ACTION to Henry:  Construct a test case for the XML test suite
> issues raised by Frans Englich:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/
> 
> 
> 5.  Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1--see
>    http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.0
>    and http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.1.
> 
> 
> 6.  LEIRIs--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#leiri
> 
> We should start talking about issuing the following spec editions
> referencing LEIRIs:
> 
>         * XML 1.0 6th Edition
>         * XML 1.1 3rd Edition
>         * XInclude 3rd Edition

We decided not to touch XLink 1.0.  XLink 1.1 is already leirified.

John wonders if we should call the next edition of XML 1.1 
the 6th Edition to match the XML 1.0 spec.

John will update the XML sources for XML 1.0 and 1.1.

Paul will update the Xinclude source (unless DV really 
wants to do it).

Paul, Norm, and Liam are responsible for dealing with pubrules
and other administrivia.

> 
> 
> 7.  xml:id--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-id
> 
> 
> 8.  XML Base 2nd Ed--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-base
> 
> 
> 9.  XLink 1.1--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xlink1.1
> 
> 
> 10.  XInclude 3rd Ed--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude
> 
> 
> 11.  Associating Stylesheets.
> 
> See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-ss
> 
> AssocSS 2nd Ed is now a Recommendation at
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/REC-xml-stylesheet-20101028/
> 
> ACTION to Henry: Update the Errata document at
> http://www.w3.org/1999/06/REC-xml-stylesheet-19990629/errata
> 
> 
> 12.  xml-model
> 
> See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-schemas
> 
> This has been published as a WG Note at
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/NOTE-xml-model-20100415/
> 
> At
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Sep/0030
> Jirka indicated the ISO version of XML model is going to DIS.
> It should be out for vote as a DIS until the end of 2010.
> 
> We will plan to update our WG Note to reference the ISO spec
> once it is officially available. We will also update our Note
> to reference the Rec version of AssocSS 2nd Ed when available.

Jirka reports that the xml-model ballot ends on April 1st.

ACTION to Liam:  Look into what it would take to make the ISO
XML Model standard (once it's an ISO standard) a W3C Recommendation.

> 
> paul
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core
> [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks
> [3]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2011Jan/0019
> 
Received on Wednesday, 9 February 2011 17:05:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 February 2011 17:05:09 GMT