W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > April 2011

Re: XML processor profiles comment from XML Core WG

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 12:03:31 +0100
To: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
Cc: public-xml-processing-model-comments@w3.org, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5b7haxhz7g.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk>
Hash: SHA1

John Cowan writes:

> My main concern is that the list of recommended profiles looks quite
> arbitrary: why these and no others?  A further concern is with the
> term "recommended": recommended for what purpose?  I would be happier
> if you just labeled them Profile I to Profile IV, or something of the
> sort.  Detaching this from its context makes it seem as if Profile IV
> is exactly what the well-respected XML parser author ought to provide
> nowadays, and it's far from clear that that's true.

Speaking with my spec. editor hat on, please expand on your last
sentence.  What _do_ you think the "well-respected XML parser author
ought to provide nowadays", and why?

- -- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

Received on Thursday, 14 April 2011 11:06:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:43 UTC