W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > September 2010

Re: Agenda for XML Core WG telcon of 2010 September 22

From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 17:28:49 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTikF-OYiYut6jNyhwXv2VodiUSc8X3JTAgiNbsJ8@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Please accept my belated regrets.

On 9/20/10, Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com> wrote:
>
> We have an XML Core WG phone call scheduled for Wednesday,
> September 22, from
>           08:30-09:00 Pacific time aka
>           11:30-12:00 Eastern time aka
>           15:30-16:00 UTC
>           16:30-17:00 in Ireland and the UK
>           17:30-18:00 in middle (most of) Europe
> on the Zakim W3C Bridge, +1 617 761 6200, passcode 9652#.
> We also use IRC channel #xmlcore on irc.w3.org:6665 .
>
> See the XML Core group page [1] for pointers to current documents
> and other information.  If you have additions to the agenda, please
> email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon.
>
> Please also review our group page's task list [2] for accuracy and
> completeness and be prepared to amend if necessary and accept it
> at the beginning of the call.
>
> Agenda
> ======
> 1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and
>    the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments,
>    or corrections ready by the beginning of the call).
>
>
> 2. Miscellaneous administrivia and document reviews.
>
> TPAC Nov 1-5 in Lyons, France
> -----------------------------
> It now looks like there will be no official XML Core WG
> meeting in Lyons.  Those on the WG who are there are free
> to meet informally, of course.  If you are planning to
> attend, be sure to register.
>
> Registration is now open; see http://www.w3.org/2010/11/TPAC/
>
> TAG concern wrt 3023bis, +xml media types and fragids
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Henry sent email about this at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Jun/0006
>
> 3023bis says that the +xml implies that the resource is suitable for
> processing by generic xml processors.  And it says that such xml
> processors should handle fragment ids.  Specifically, handling the
> fragment identifiers in an rdf+xml document is not something that a
> generic xml processor could do.
>
> The TAG was leaning toward removing the statement from 3023bis that
> says that fragid syntax and semantics is something that any generic
> xml processor can handle in a +xml resource.  Noah sent email and
> Norm has replied.  See the thread at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Jun/thread.html#msg125
>
> Somewhat related, Henry sent email about XML fragid interpretation at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Jun/0025
>
> Norm and John prefer to allow RDF (and others) to be an exception,
> but the rule is that the default treatment is as specified in
> XPointer Framework.
>
> Norm and John (among others) weighed in; see the thread at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Jun/thread.html#msg125
> and
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Jul/thread.html#msg0
>
> Norm's latest (as of July 26, posted July 14) is at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Jul/0020
>
> Per Noah's email at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Aug/0003
> there will be no new status until September.
>
>
> 3.  XML 1.0--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-errata
>
>
> 4.  XML Test Suite.
>
> See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-test-suite
>
> ACTION to Henry:  Construct a test case for the XML test suite
> issues raised by Frans Englich:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/
>
>
> 5.  Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1--see
>    http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.0
>    and http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.1.
>
>
> 6.  LEIRIs--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#leiri
>
>
> 7.  xml:id--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-id
>
>
> 8.  XML Base 2nd Ed--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-base
>
>
> 9.  XLink 1.1--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xlink1.1
>
> Mohamed asked if xlink should point to xlink11; see
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Aug/0003
>
> The XLink 1.0 Recommendation at http://www.w3.org/TR/xlink/
> now has had a reference to XLink 1.1 added.
>
>
> 10.  XInclude 3rd Ed--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude
>
>
> 11.  Associating Stylesheets.
>
> See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-ss
>
> AssocSS 2nd Ed is out for review as a PER; announcement:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ac-members/2010JulSep/0050
> PER draft:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/PER-xml-stylesheet-20100909/
>
>
> 12.  xml-model
>
> See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-schemas
>
> This has been published as a WG Note at
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/NOTE-xml-model-20100415/
>
> At
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Aug/0046
> Jirka indicated the completion of a successful SC34 ballot of
> XML Model.  The ISO process continues, but looks promising.
>
> We will plan to update our WG Note to reference the ISO spec
> once it is officially available.
>
>
> paul
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core
> [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks
> [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Sep/0017
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 22 September 2010 15:29:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 22 September 2010 15:29:28 GMT