W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > November 2010

Agenda for XML Core WG telcon of 2010 December 1

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 10:27:58 -0500
Message-ID: <9B2DE9094C827E44988F5ADAA6A2C5DA017CC70F@HQ-MAIL9.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>

We have an XML Core WG phone call scheduled for Wednesday, 
December 1, from
          08:30-09:00 Pacific time aka
          11:30-12:00 Eastern time aka
          15:30-16:00 UTC 
          16:30-17:00 in Ireland and the UK  
          17:30-18:00 in middle (most of) Europe  
on the Zakim W3C Bridge, +1 617 761 6200, passcode 9652#.
We also use IRC channel #xmlcore on irc.w3.org:6665 .

See the XML Core group page [1] for pointers to current documents
and other information.  If you have additions to the agenda, please
email them to the WG list before the start of the telcon.

Please also review our group page's task list [2] for accuracy and
completeness and be prepared to amend if necessary and accept it
at the beginning of the call.

Regrets from Norm; probable regrets from DV.

Agenda
======
1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and
   the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments,
   or corrections ready by the beginning of the call).


2. Miscellaneous administrivia and document reviews.

TAG concern wrt 3023bis, +xml media types and fragids
-----------------------------------------------------
3023bis says that the +xml implies that the resource is suitable for 
processing by generic xml processors.  And it says that such xml
processors should handle fragment ids.  Specifically, handling the
fragment identifiers in an rdf+xml document is not something that a 
generic xml processor could do.

The TAG was leaning toward removing the statement from 3023bis that
says that fragid syntax and semantics is something that any generic
xml processor can handle in a +xml resource.  Noah sent email and
Norm has replied.  See the thread at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Jun/thread.html#msg125

Somewhat related, Henry sent email about XML fragid interpretation at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Jun/0025

Norm and John prefer to allow RDF (and others) to be an exception,
but the rule is that the default treatment is as specified in
XPointer Framework.

As of 2010 November 22, the denouement from the TAG 
appears to be represented by email to the 3023bis editors at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Nov/0078
along with a response from the 3023bis editors at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Nov/0095
wherein they appear likely to maintain the rule but allow 
RDF to be grandfathered as an exception.


Charter renewal
---------------
We need to consider what we want for our charter for 2011
and 2012.  Liam has drafted one at
http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/10/xml-core-charter.html

Mohamed has suggested that XML Performance could become in the 
scope of XML Core.  He also sent email at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Nov/0012
talking about other things, but I'm not sure how to characterize
what it would be we might do.


XPointer registry and the xpath() scheme
----------------------------------------
Norm sent email requesting re-instatement of the xpath() scheme at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xpointer-registry/2010OctDec/
0002


XML Processor Profiles review
-----------------------------
We have been asked to review the XML Processing Model WG's 
Last Call Working Draft of "XML processor profiles" when
it is published at http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-proc-profiles/.
As of today, there is a 21 October 2010 draft there.


3.  XML 1.0--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-errata


4.  XML Test Suite.

See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-test-suite

ACTION to Henry:  Construct a test case for the XML test suite 
issues raised by Frans Englich:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/ 


5.  Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1--see
   http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.0
   and http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.1.


6.  LEIRIs--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#leiri


7.  xml:id--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-id


8.  XML Base 2nd Ed--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-base


9.  XLink 1.1--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xlink1.1


10.  XInclude 3rd Ed--see http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude


11.  Associating Stylesheets.

See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-ss

AssocSS 2nd Ed is now a Recommendation at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/REC-xml-stylesheet-20101028/

ACTION to Henry: Update the Errata document at
http://www.w3.org/1999/06/REC-xml-stylesheet-19990629/errata


12.  xml-model

See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-schemas

This has been published as a WG Note at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/NOTE-xml-model-20100415/

At
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Sep/0030
Jirka indicated the ISO version of XML model is going to DIS.
It should be out for vote as a DIS until the end of the year.

We will plan to update our WG Note to reference the ISO spec
once it is officially available. We will also update our Note
to reference the Rec version of AssocSS 2nd Ed when available.


paul

[1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core
[2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks
[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Nov/0006
Received on Monday, 29 November 2010 15:28:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 29 November 2010 15:28:32 GMT