W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > May 2010

XML Core WG Status and Open Actions as of 2010 May 24

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 10:34:22 -0400
Message-ID: <CF83BAA719FD2C439D25CBB1C9D1D3021369B12A@HQ-MAIL4.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>

The XML Core WG telcons are every other week.

Our next telcon will be 2010 June 2.
Paul and Daniel send regrets; both give proxy to the chair;
Norm will chair.


Status and open actions
=======================

LEIRI
-----
See
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Mar/0045
from Dan Connolly which references
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Mar/0037

At (among other places)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010May/0001
Larry Masinter explains the plan, to wit:

 http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-00#section-1.3
 contains a definition in section 1.3 on "LEIRI proessing" which 
 should in fact be a definition of LEIRI:

  LEIRI:  This term was used in various XML specifications to
      refer to strings that, although not valid IRIs, were
      acceptable input to the processing rules in Section 7.1.

 where Section 7.1 of the same document is intended to contain an
 algorithm that will convert an LEIRI to an IRI.

 If that's adequate for XML Core to change its reference for LEIRI,
 fine, and if you need more, please say so.

A direct reference to Section 7.1 is
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-00#section-7.1

ACTION to Henry, Mohamed:  Review the definition and discussion
of LEIRIs in http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-00
and let the WG know if this would allow us to replace our LEIRI
Note with a reference to this spec.


Associating Stylesheets
-----------------------
See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-ss

We are working toward a PER for AssocSS 2nd Edition.

Our latest public draft is at
http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/04/xml-stylesheet/

The transition request for AssocSS is at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Apr/0034

We had an unsuccessful transition call last week.  See
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Apr/0057

The editors drafted new wording for Section 2 Conformance; see
http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/05/xml-stylesheet/
http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/05/xml-stylesheet/diff.html

Paul sent email to Daniel Glazman and TimBL requesting comment at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010May/0012

If we haven't heard anything by end of this week (May 28), then:

ACTION to Liam (as staff contact):  Request that this latest draft at
http://www.w3.org/XML/2010/05/xml-stylesheet/
be accepted as the PER per the transition request at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2010Apr/0034
and that the PER review be published with appropriately adjusted
dates (which the editors and staff contacts should determine).
Received on Monday, 24 May 2010 14:35:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:42 UTC