W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > March 2010

RE: New editors' draft of AssocSS for review

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:42:35 -0500
Message-ID: <CF83BAA719FD2C439D25CBB1C9D1D302129BA2E3@HQ-MAIL4.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henry S. Thompson [mailto:ht@inf.ed.ac.uk]
> Sent: Wednesday, 2010 March 10 9:41
> To: Grosso, Paul
> Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: New editors' draft of AssocSS for review
 
> Grosso, Paul writes:
> 
> > First change in section 2 ends with:
> >
> >  which are available for application to the containing document.
> >
> > Is there a word missing, or are you using "application" in
> > a different sense (in which case, I think we should reword).
> 
> No word missing -- how about "...are available to be applied to..." ?

That's better.

> >
> > Under "charset" the new note says "must be ignored".
> > Ignored by what?  The xml-stylesheet processor, the
> > application, something else?  I think we need to say.
> 
> Good point, let's discuss.

OK
Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2010 15:43:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 10 March 2010 15:43:07 GMT