- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:19:12 -0500
- To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xml-core-wg- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Henry S. Thompson > Sent: Wednesday, 2010 March 10 7:10 > To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > Subject: New editors' draft of AssocSS for review > > Per last meeting and subsequent emails. > > http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2009/09/xml-stylesheet.html Looking good. Some quick comments: ----- First change in section 2 ends with: which are available for application to the containing document. Is there a word missing, or are you using "application" in a different sense (in which case, I think we should reword). ----- Second change in section 2 using the phrase "conformant xsl-stylesheet processors" whereas the preceding sentence uses "conforming xsl-stylesheet processors". I see no reason for the gratuitous difference. We should also scan the rest of the document for "conformant" and change it to "conforming" unless there is a good reason not to. ----- Under "charset" the new note says "must be ignored". Ignored by what? The xml-stylesheet processor, the application, something else? I think we need to say. ----- Appendix B, first bullet: s/by/but/ ----- paul
Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2010 15:19:49 UTC