W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > January 2010

Issue taylor-1 (editorial, pending) Re: AssocSS comments

From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:22:26 +0100
To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.u67enoehidj3kv@simon-pieterss-macbook.local>
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:51:19 +0100, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote:

> Issue taylor-1 (editorial, pending)
> 4 low-level editorial points, [from paras 3, 5, 6 and 7]
> Origin: Philip Taylor <pjt47@cam.ac.uk>:  
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-stylesheet-comments/2009Dec/0003.html
>> "Each PredefEntityRef in PseudoAttValue is replaced with with  
>> ..."s/with with/with/
>>
>> "If it's not reported to the application" - s/it's/it is/
>>
>> " [1] StyleSheetPI ::= "<?xml-stylesheet" (S PseudoAtts)? - (Char* "?>" 
>> Char*) "?>" "
>> Should be:
>> " [1] StyleSheetPI ::= "<?xml-stylesheet" ((S PseudoAtts)? - (Char* "?>" 
>> Char*)) "?>" "
>> since the precedence of the XML EBNF '-' operator is undefined.
>>
>> "If specified, documents may use any string as the value." - seems like 
>> abuse of RFC2119 terminology. "X may do Y" means X can optionally choose 
>> to do Y or to not do Y, but it's impossible to choose not to use any 
>> string as the value if you specify the value. Maybe s/may/can/ (there's 
>> no need to use a conformance requirement keyword when you're not 
>> requiring anything).
> Discussions:

Agreed.

-- 
Simon Pieters
Opera Software
Received on Wednesday, 27 January 2010 18:23:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 27 January 2010 18:23:02 GMT