W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > February 2010

RE: Announcements about xml-model in other fora

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:07:23 -0500
Message-ID: <CF83BAA719FD2C439D25CBB1C9D1D302125FCC78@HQ-MAIL4.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Henry S. Thompson
> Sent: Wednesday, 2010 February 17 5:59
> To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Announcements about xml-model in other fora
> http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/201002/msg00011.html
>  [substantial thread running here]

Thanks, Henry.

The "substantial" thread is substantially about the name itself
and whether it should be xml-schema instead of xml-model with
people on both sides of the argument.

Which isn't particularly substantive in my mind.  I guess that's
good.  At least no one has yet said it's a completely bad idea.

Received on Wednesday, 17 February 2010 16:08:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:41 UTC