W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > August 2010

RE: xml-model in SC34

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:22:43 -0400
Message-ID: <9B2DE9094C827E44988F5ADAA6A2C5DABF0BF7@HQ-MAIL9.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Good to hear.

I note that the layout and organization of
http://www.itscj.ipsj.or.jp/sc34/open/1437.pdf

isn't the same as our WG Note at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/NOTE-xml-model-20100415/


Am I correct that the content is effectively identical?

How will someone looking at this ISO spec know that it
is identical to our WG Note?

In short, we effectively want our publicly available and 
web-referenceable WG Note to be the public equivalent of
the (not publicly available and referenceable) ISO standard.

Have we achieved this?

paul

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jirka Kosek [mailto:jirka@kosek.cz]
> Sent: Tuesday, 2010 August 31 9:50
> To: Grosso, Paul
> Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: xml-model in SC34
> 
> Grosso, Paul wrote:
> 
> > 12.  xml-model
> >
> > See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-schemas

> >
> > This has been published as a WG Note at
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/NOTE-xml-model-20100415/

> >
> > XML Model is being balloted by SC34 until the ? of August.
> > In the middle of September SC34 will have a face-to-face meeting
> > where they will discuss comments received during the ballot.
> >
> > Jirka will bring SC34 comments, concerns, and proposed resolutions
> > back to XML Core WG in the second half of September.
> 
> The SC34 ballot finished. The draft got only "yes" votes and no
> comments
> were received. Thus there is no need to change anything in the current
> W3C Note for xml-model. SC34 document will be sent to a next stage
> ballot and it should pass it smoothly. I think that there are two more
> ballots which has to be passed before xml-model gets international
> standard status.
> 
> I want to thank to all members of WG for careful review xml-model
> during
> its processing in W3C. In my opinion this is a reason why no comments
> were received in ISO process.
> 
> Have a nice day,
> 
> 				Jirka
> 
> 
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>   Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz      http://xmlguru.cz

> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>        Professional XML consulting and training services
>   DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>  OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member
> ------------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Tuesday, 31 August 2010 20:23:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:42 UTC