W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > August 2010

RE: XML Core WG Status and Open Actions as of 2010 August 16

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 12:02:52 -0400
Message-ID: <9B2DE9094C827E44988F5ADAA6A2C5DAA8576C@HQ-MAIL9.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henry S. Thompson [mailto:ht@inf.ed.ac.uk]
> Sent: Thursday, 2010 August 19 10:59
> To: Grosso, Paul
> Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: XML Core WG Status and Open Actions as of 2010 August 16
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Grosso, Paul writes:
> 
> > But you didn't add the paragraph verbatim.  The WG decided
> > quite carefully to add it verbatim despite the fact--or
> > because of the fact--that it made no sense as written.
> >
> > I really want the paragraph verbatim.  Don't even try to
> > add any links.
> 
> OK, done.  And I now _have_ taken my name off it.

I understand, but let's discuss all this during our next telcon.
You missed the call where we discussed it, and Norm voted your
proxy.  Given your strong feelings, it seems preferably to me
to discuss this again.

paul

> 
>   http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2009/09/xml-stylesheet.html
> 
> > Why does this have a copy of the "An xml-stylesheet processor may be
> > part..."
> > para under "xml-stylesheet processors" inserted and then crossed
out?
> >
> > Same question about the Note.
> >
> > Is it because the diff is showing the differences between our
> > previously last editors draft rather than the May 19 draft PER?
> 
> Between the 20 April draft, which is what you told me to edit, and
> which is what Glazou and TimBL were responding to, and the current
> draft.
> 
> > If so, is this the right thing to be doing, or should we instead
> > just be doing diffs between the May 19 draft and the latest?
> 
> I think so, but I can change it if the Group says to do so.
> 
> ht
> - --
>        Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of
> Edinburgh
>       10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-
> 4440
>                 Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
>                        URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
>  [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is
> forged spam]
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFMbVTLkjnJixAXWBoRAh3zAJ9CkFEQy1NtvD8IMmjvvc5Bfj+yzACfVke3
> UPkNctz4iTGAlgdRf+gWO/4=
> =rLRE
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 19 August 2010 18:55:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:42 UTC