W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > April 2010

RE: Transition Request: PER Request for Associating Style Sheets with XML documents 1.0 (Second Edition)

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 11:19:41 -0400
Message-ID: <CF83BAA719FD2C439D25CBB1C9D1D3021305BFFB@HQ-MAIL4.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: "Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org>
Cc: "Daniel Glazman" <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, <timbl@w3.org>, <ralph@w3.org>, <liam@w3.org>, "Ian Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>, <w3t-comm@w3.org>, <chairs@w3.org>, <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Philippe Le Hegaret [mailto:plh@w3.org]
> Sent: Friday, 2010 April 16 9:36
> To: Grosso, Paul
> Cc: Daniel Glazman; timbl@w3.org; ralph@w3.org; liam@w3.org; Ian
> Jacobs; w3t-comm@w3.org; chairs@w3.org; public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Transition Request: PER Request for Associating Style
> Sheets with XML documents 1.0 (Second Edition)
> 
> On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 09:49 -0400, Grosso, Paul wrote:
> > Daniel is correct that his comments (and objections) are not
> > yet reflected in the DoC referenced by my Transition Request email.
> >
> > Daniel's comments came in a bit later than others, and there
> > remains an outstanding action item for that DoC to be updated
> > accordingly, and I hadn't realized that action wasn't yet
> > completed when I sent in the transisition request.
> >
> > I will push to get that action completed as soon as possible.
> 
> And the new DoC will reflect the objection from Daniel?

Yes.

paul
Received on Friday, 16 April 2010 15:20:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 16 April 2010 15:20:18 GMT