W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > April 2010

RE: Comments on xml-model

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:51:15 -0400
Message-ID: <CF83BAA719FD2C439D25CBB1C9D1D30212F811B1@HQ-MAIL4.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: "Jirka Kosek" <jirka@kosek.cz>
Cc: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
I put in that wording, and I'm sending in the pub request now.

p.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jirka Kosek [mailto:jirka@kosek.cz]
> Sent: Friday, 2010 April 09 17:00
> To: Grosso, Paul
> Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Comments on xml-model
> 
> Grosso, Paul wrote:
> 
> > I'm going to send in the transition request now, but
> > if Jirka (or anybody else) wants to suggest some new
> > wording, I'll stick that in.
> 
> What about this?
> 
> "By default only schemas which do not have a group pseudo-attribute
> specified or schemas which have an empty value in a group
> pseudo-attribute on the corresponding xml-model processing instruction
> are treated as being associated with XML document."
Received on Monday, 12 April 2010 15:51:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 12 April 2010 15:51:52 GMT