- From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 18:22:22 -0400
- To: "XML CORE" <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
The XML Core WG telcons are every other week. Our next telcon will be September 9 assuming Henry can chair (both Paul and Norm send regrets). Status and open actions ======================= Unicode normalization in XML 1.0 -------------------------------- Addison Phillips of I18N sent email about Unicode Normalization in XML 1.0 5th Ed.; see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Feb/0019 We have agreed on a note to add. ACTION to Francois: Process the suggested additional note as an erratum to XML 1.0 5th Edition. HTML request for clearer XML serialization ------------------------------------------ Henry raised the issue that HTML folks think the XML spec is broken because it doesn't define error recovery and doesn't discuss serialization. Simon added his understanding of the issue at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Jun/0007 (second half of the message) and a thread starting with a reply from John ensued at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Jun/thread.ht ml#msg8 Perhaps with this email beginning, Henry only needs to reply to that thread, but for now, I'll leave the following action: ACTION to Henry: Send email to the XML Core WG list outlining the suggestion to define a serialization spec including the rationale. XML 1.0 ------- Issues with the 5th Edition Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1 ------------------------- See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.0 and http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.1. The NS 1.0 2nd Ed Errata document is at http://www.w3.org/XML/2006/xml-names-errata The NS PE doc is at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata.html NS 1.0 3rd Ed is in PER at http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/PER-xml-names-20090806/ until 2009-09-14. xml:id ------ The xml:id Recommendation is at http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-xml-id-20050909/ The Errata document is at http://www.w3.org/2005/09/xml-id-errata John Cowan submitted a proposed erratum at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Jan/0009 At one point we thought we had Consensus: The sentence "A document that uses xml:id attributes that have a declared type other than xs:ID will always generate xml:id errors" in Appendix D.3 should be deleted. But they we reconsidered. Henry sent further email at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0048 We did agree that applying xml:id processing does not have any impact on the DTD/XSD validity of the document. John re-summarized his thoughts at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009May/0008 ACTION to Henry (and others): Continue the xml:id issue discussion in email. --- Richard pointed out the following note in XML Base (just before section 3.1): This specification does not give the xml:base attribute any special status as far as XML validity is concerned. In a valid document the attribute must be declared in the DTD, and similar considerations apply to other schema languages. and suggested a similar note should go into xml:id in D.1. --- There was also some email about some typos for which we (Henry) should process an editorial erratum: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0050 ACTION to Henry: Process an xml:id erratum to correct the typos; ref http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0050 XLink 1.1 --------- See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xlink1.1 The XLink 1.1 Last Call has been published at http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-xlink11-20080331/ The LC review period ended 16 May 2008. Norm has prepared an updated DoC at http://www.w3.org/XML/2008/05/xlinklc/ Paul summarized the open issues at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0045 Norm replied at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009May/0009 ACTION to Norm: Update the DoC accordingly. The latest editor's draft (of the PR) is at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xlink11/ and a diff-with-the-last-CR draft is at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xlink11/Overview-diff.html We are still fiddling to get the correct DTDs/XSDs/RNCs in. John sent email about this at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Jul/0039.html ACTION to Henry: Update the DTDs (both for full and simple conformance) so that the xlink:type attribute has no default (e.g., is #IMPLIED). Henry finds the DTD/RelaxNG/XSD fragments throughout the spec unhelpful and would like to remove them (leaving them only in the appendices). Henry specifically referenced the example immediately preceding 5.3. But this was in the CR, so we will probably leave it, but we will remove the default for xlink:type. Henry sent an XML Schema for simple-conformant XLink at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009May/0019 ACTION to Norm: Update the draft with the correct DTD, XSD, and RNC. We plan to skip CR and going directly to PR. Paul drafted a PR transition request at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Mar/0013 Norm created an updated IR at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xlink11/ir.html ACTION to Norm: Adding a mention of the test suite at http://www.w3.org/XML/2006/03/xlink11-tests to the IR. ACTION to Norm: Create a diff between 1.0 and the 1.1 PR ready draft. XInclude 3rd Edition PER ------------------------ See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude XInclude 2nd Edition is at: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xinclude-20061115 ACTION to Daniel: Produce a PER-ready draft of XInclude 3rd Ed with appropriate references to the IRI RFC for LEIRIs. Associating Stylesheets ----------------------- See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#assoc-ss Associating stylesheets with XML version 1.0 is at: http://www.w3.org/1999/06/REC-xml-stylesheet-19990629/ The Errata document is at: http://www.w3.org/1999/06/REC-xml-stylesheet-19990629/errata The latest issues document with CONSENSUS resoltions is at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2009/06/assocss-issues.htm ACTION to Henry and Simon: Produce a draft of the AssocSS 2nd Ed PER.
Received on Tuesday, 1 September 2009 22:24:40 UTC