W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > November 2009

Re: Comments on AssocSS Editor's Draft 10 November 2009

From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 07:49:47 +0100
To: "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.u3i089igidj3kv@simon-pieterss-macbook.local>
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:35:24 +0100, Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com> wrote:

>> >> "The productions in this specification use the same notation as used
>> in
>> >> the XML specification [XML]. Symbols in the grammar that are not
>> >> defined
>> >> in this specification are defined in the XML specification."
>>
>> Forgot to comment on this part. The question is not moot since the
>> paragraph quoted above is still in the draft (in the terminology
>> section;
>
> I missed that.  I guess I'd change "Symbols" to "Tokens" there
> unless someone else has a better suggestion or strong opinion.

Done.


>> maybe that's out of place, maybe the terminology and conformance
>> sections
>> should be merged, since infoset and XML are more of dependencies than
>> mere terminology).
>
> I think the terminology and conformance sections are good
> separated as they are.

I merged them earlier today, but let's see what others think.

-- 
Simon Pieters
Opera Software
Received on Tuesday, 17 November 2009 06:50:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:16:41 UTC