Re: Changes checked in to son-of-3023

Simon Pieters scripsit:

> Sorry to chime in this late, but I don't understand why we don't just fix  
> the text/xml encoding problem by saying that it's equivalent to  
> application/xml instead of keeping a requirement that all implementors  
> will continue to ignore? 

Since it's an IETF RFC, there's nothing the WG can do.  As an individual,
you could create a draft replacement RFC making this change.

-- 
John Cowan              http://www.ccil.org/~cowan      cowan@ccil.org
Would your name perchance be surname Puppet, given name Sock?
                --Rick Moen