Henri Sivonen wrote: >> But such information is suitable for separate W3C Note. It has nothing >> to do with HTML5 spec. > > (There's no such thing as W3C Notes. There are Working Group Notes.) > > Why a Note and not a REC track publication? It seems that you are much familiar with W3C Process then me but AFAIK Note doesn't require rechartering. Personally I really don't care whether it will be Note or REC, but producing REC will require more cycles from working group and editors. Moreover think that such document will be more like best practice then real binding recommendation. >> I suppose that example XML catalog which maps known DTDs to just entity >> definitions would be nice addition to possible W3C Note I have mentioned >> above. > > Implementors should be able to simply say |new > BrowserCompatibleEntityResolver()|. LOL, Henri as you know XML API situation in Java much better then me, you should be aware that JAXP is really not interface which is developed and maintained in an agile way. ;-) Yep, but I agree that it would be nice to have such facility out of the box. Jirka -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://xmlguru.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------ Professional XML consulting and training services DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing ------------------------------------------------------------------ OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 member ------------------------------------------------------------------Received on Wednesday, 4 November 2009 10:16:51 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 4 November 2009 10:16:52 GMT