W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > May 2009

Xlink 1.1 [was: XML Core WG Status and Open Actions as of 2009 May 26]

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 14:53:54 -0400
Message-ID: <CF83BAA719FD2C439D25CBB1C9D1D3020FBFBAE2@HQ-MAIL4.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
 

> XLink 1.1
> ---------
> See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xlink1.1
> 
> The XLink 1.1 Last Call has been published at
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-xlink11-20080331/
> 
> The LC review period ended 16 May 2008.
> 

The lastest editor's draft (22 April 2009) is at
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/xmlcore/xlink11/

> Norm has prepared an updated DoC at 
> http://www.w3.org/XML/2008/05/xlinklc/
> 
> Paul summarized the open issues at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Apr/0045
> 
> Norm replied at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009May/0009
> 
> ACTION to Norm:  Update the DoC accordingly.
> 
> There's an open question about whether the XSD/DTD 
> should default the xlink:type attribute value. 
> None of this effects our last call because the
> XSD/DTD are not normative.

Can someone remind us what this is about?  What exactly is the question?
Is it that it should be defaulted but isn't, or is shouldn't be
defaulted
but it is?  And on which element?  And in which DTD/XSD?

And what's the answer to the question?

> 
> Henry sent an XML Schema for simple-conformant XLink at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009May/0019
> 
> ACTION to Norm, John:  Review Henry's candidate basic level 
> conformance XSD.
> 
> John sent RelaxNG schemas at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009May/0022
> 
> ACTION to Norm, Mohamed:  Review John's RelaxNG schemas.

Norm, Mohamed, I added this ACTION since our last telcon--do you
accept this action?

> 
> We plan to skip CR and going directly to PR.
> 
> Paul drafted a PR transition request at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2009Mar/0013
> 
> The Implementation Report at
> http://www.w3.org/XML/2006/01/xlink11-implementation
> is pitiful.  We'll need to augment this to be able to request PR.
> 
> ACTION to Norm: Dig up more for the XLink 1.1 implementation report.
Received on Tuesday, 26 May 2009 19:00:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 26 May 2009 19:00:13 GMT