RE: Assoc SS issue list

Thanks, please check my updates to
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2009/06/assocss-issues.htm

You say:

> 7. I don't understand (a), as it leaves the treatment of 'alternate'
>    unspecified.

but then later you say:

> 11. Prefer (a)

but note that 11a says "See #7a", so I wonder what you are preferring
for 11.  Can you explain what it is about 7a that needs to be
amplified for you to understand it?  As far as how an invalid value
for "alternate" should be handled per #7a, pick any of 7b-7f as
you wish.

The point of 7a is to say that the xml-stylesheet processor should
not validate values for pseudo-attributes that correspond to something 
in HTML's link element; alternate is NOT an HTML thing, but something
invented by the Assoc SS spec.

paul


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henry S. Thompson [mailto:ht@inf.ed.ac.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, 2009 June 30 10:38
> To: Grosso, Paul
> Cc: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Assoc SS issue list
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 1. Agreed
> 2. Agreed
> 3. Live with (c), prefer (e), can't live with others
> 4. Agreed
> 5. Live with (e) and (g), can't live with others (don't _like_ any of
> them)
> 6. Prefer (b), can live with (a)
> 7. I don't understand (a), as it leaves the treatment of 'alternate'
>    unspecified.  Prefer (e), can live with (f)
> 8. Prefer (b), can't live with (a)
> 9. Prefer (a), can't live with (b)
> 10. Can't live with (a), (c.i) or (c.ii), can live with (b), (c.iii)
or
> (c.iv)
> 11. Prefer (a), can't live with (b) [It's not reasonable to require
>     apps to do the complex validation required by _any_ of the listed
>     specs]
> 12, 13, 14. Prefer (a), can't live with (b)
> 15. Prefer (a), can live with (b) or (c).
> 
> ht
> - --
>        Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of
> Edinburgh
>                          Half-time member of W3C Team
>       10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-
> 4440
>                 Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
>                        URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
> [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is
> forged spam]
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFKSjFqkjnJixAXWBoRAqF+AJ9tkLGAJnHVCJbsMA8ON+f8oOswYQCgghAH
> r+ttiIGdqNQspp+U5rR69IY=
> =zbmm
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Tuesday, 30 June 2009 16:11:49 UTC