W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > June 2009

Re: Minutes for XML Core WG telcon of 2009 June 3

From: Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 21:17:23 +0200
Message-ID: <546c6c1c0906031217p118c8a06v94d6a74ed7b43e28@mail.gmail.com>
To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
Cc: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>, public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Simon,

On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 03 Jun 2009 19:32:45 +0200, John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org> wrote:
>
>  Simon Pieters scripsit:
>>
>>  I think the issue here is that the XML spec doesn't define how to convert
>>> a stream of bytes into a parsed tree (in terms of some tree model --
>>> HTML5
>>> uses the DOM as the model but this does not restrict implementations to
>>> use DOM). The XML spec just states what is the allowed syntax, and the
>>> mapping to a tree model is implied.
>>>
>>
>> The Infoset spec does that.
>>
>
> No, it just defines a model of a parsed tree, just like the DOM Core spec
> defines a separate model of a parsed tree. The mapping from bytes to the
> tree model is not explicitly defined like it is in HTML5.


How do you see such information : in its own specification ? in XML 1.0 ? in
DOM/Infoset ?

Mohamed

-- 
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 9 52 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 
Received on Wednesday, 3 June 2009 19:18:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 3 June 2009 19:18:01 GMT