Re: Editor's review copy of XML Namespaces 1.0 Third Edition

On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:52:15AM -0400, John Cowan wrote:
> That's just what's being proposed
[...]

Oops, I'll go back to sleep :-)

Thanks for the reply.  The proposal is fine by me, although I
think in the long term some more visible "registry" might be
a better option.

Liam


-- 
Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/ * http://www.fromoldbooks.org/

Received on Thursday, 23 July 2009 16:38:00 UTC