W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > April 2009

RE: XML Core WG comment on Pointer Methods in RDF

From: Carlos Iglesias <carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:02:55 +0000
Message-ID: <09700B613C4DD84FA9F2FEA52188281905AD75D5@ayalga.fundacionctic.org>
To: "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>, <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Cc: <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>

Dear Paul,

Thank you for these comments, they are helpful.
We will study them in detail during the next days.

Regards,
 CI.

____________________

Carlos Iglesias

Fundación CTIC
Parque Científico-Tecnológico de Gijón
33203 - Gijón, Asturias, España
teléfono: +34 984291212
email: carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org
URL: http://www.fundacionctic.org  


> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: public-wai-ert-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-wai-ert-request@w3.org] En nombre de Grosso, Paul
> Enviado el: viernes, 10 de abril de 2009 16:46
> Para: public-wai-ert@w3.org
> CC: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Asunto: XML Core WG comment on Pointer Methods in RDF
> 
> The XML Core WG has reviewed "Pointer Methods in RDF":
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-Pointers-in-RDF-20090310/
> 
> On the whole, the pointer framework described by this 
> document seems to be well thought out. There are two areas on 
> which the XML Core WG wishes to provide feedback.
> 
> The WD defines an element (an RDF property actually, but one 
> that's serialized as an element) named "ptr:XMLNamespace".  
> Per the XML Recommendation [1]:
> 
>  Names beginning with the string "xml", or with any string 
> which  would match (('X'|'x') ('M'|'m') ('L'|'l')), are 
> reserved for  standardization in this or future versions of 
> this specification.
> 
> Since, using a default namespace, it is always (at least 
> theoretically) possible that a local name may appear without 
> a prefix, the name "ptr:XMLNamespace" does violate that above 
> statement in the XML spec.
> 
> We would ask that the ERT WG consider using a different name 
> that avoids this issue.
> 
> The second point is of more substantial technical import.
> Although the Pointer Methods spec discusses pointing into XML 
> as one of the use cases, many of the pointers provided by the 
> spec operate (or appear to operate) on the character 
> serialization of the resource.  But when accessing an XML 
> document as an XML document (and not as merely a text-based 
> resource), one is really accessing the XML Infoset [2], and 
> character or byte based pointing mechanisms do not make sense.
> 
> For example, it's not clear what meaning one could associate 
> with a pointer range that started in the beginning of an end 
> tag and ended in the middle of an attribute name on some 
> following start tag. 
> It is not even coherent to assert the existence of such a 
> range in an XML document.
> 
> Perahps the answer is as simple as saying "don't use 
> line/char, char offset, byte snippet, etc. pointers when 
> pointing into XML documents"
> but we believe the Pointer Methods spec does need to address 
> this issue.
> 
> paul
> 
> Paul Grosso for the XML Core WG
> 
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xml/#dt-name
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-infoset/
Received on Monday, 20 April 2009 14:21:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 20 April 2009 14:21:06 GMT