Grosso, Paul scripsit: > Remember that SHOULD implies that an implementation needs to have a > "good reason" to do otherwise (where "good reason" is, of course, > undefined), so while an implementation isn't non-compliant if it does > otherwise, there is still some force of standardization to follow > the recommendation. RFC 2119 specifically says: [T]here may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to ignore a particular [requirement], but the full implications must be understood and carefully weighed before choosing a different course. -- John Cowan cowan@ccil.org http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Does anybody want any flotsam? / I've gotsam. Does anybody want any jetsam? / I can getsam. --Ogden Nash, No Doctors Today, Thank YouReceived on Saturday, 18 April 2009 19:00:59 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 April 2009 19:01:00 GMT