Re: Moving XML 1.0 5e forward: suggestions arising from the Call for Review

Henry S. Thompson scripsit:

> I have in fact now produced a cheap and cheerful DoC document:
> 
>   http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2008/09/xml-5e/disposition.html

boyer-1 should be rejected, as the Char production has not changed.
What is more, the UTF-8 encoding already does what he says it should do:
it maps the entire range of 0-0x10FFFF to bytes.

-- 
John Cowan                                <cowan@ccil.org>
Yakka foob mog.  Grug pubbawup zink wattoom gazork.  Chumble spuzz.
    --Calvin, giving Newton's First Law "in his own words"