W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > November 2008

Re: James Clark's comment on XML Namespace vs. XML 1.0 5e

From: Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 10:33:34 -0500
To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20081103153333.GB20608@w3.org>

On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 09:54:13AM -0500, John Cowan wrote:
> Henry S. Thompson scripsit:
> 
> > I suggest we consider as a matter of urgency issuing an erratum
> > against Namespaces allowing Namespace implementations to track XML by
> > using 5e's definition of NameStartChar, at the same time that we
> > publish XML 5e.
> 
> Yes.  Absolutely essential.

+1 -- it looks as if this what the implementations already do this,
in any case, or at least that they don't check the characters twice...

Liam

-- 
Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/ * http://www.fromoldbooks.org/
Received on Monday, 3 November 2008 15:33:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 3 November 2008 15:33:43 GMT