W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xml-core-wg@w3.org > March 2008

RE: Namespaces erratum?

From: Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:21:45 -0400
Message-ID: <CF83BAA719FD2C439D25CBB1C9D1D3020AE35B52@HQ-MAIL4.ptcnet.ptc.com>
To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>, <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>
Cc: "Tim Bray" <tbray@textuality.com>

And I just forwarded it to the NS comments list for tracking:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-names-editor/2008Mar/0000

paul 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-xml-core-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Norman Walsh
> Sent: Wednesday, 2008 March 26 12:27
> To: public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
> Cc: Tim Bray
> Subject: Namespaces erratum?
> 
> Via Tim Bray
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From:  <Nicolas.Weidmann@lodh.com>
> Date: Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 7:22 AM
> Subject: Namespaces in XML 1.0
> 
> Dear Mr. Bray,
> 
> Out of curiousity, I was reading some XML specs and saw that the use
> of 'Letter' in XML 1.0 for 'Name'(s) was replaced by the errata by
> 'NameStartChar'.
> 
> In XML Namespaces 1.0 2nd edition, NCNameStartChar is however still
> using 'Letter'. In the 1.1 version of those specs, it has been
> replaced by 'NameStartChar'.
> 
> Since there is currently no errata for the namespaces 1.0 specs, I
> would like to know if 'Letter' has to be considered legal as 'Letter'
> has been replaced by 'NameStartChar' by the XML 1.0 erratum?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> Nicolas Weidmann
> 
Received on Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:24:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 26 March 2008 18:24:45 GMT