- From: Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 15:05:34 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
- Cc: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>, <timbl@w3.org>, <steve@w3.org>, <public-xml-core-wg@w3.org>, <webreq@w3.org>, <chairs@w3.org>, <w3t-comm@w3.org>, <michelsu@microsoft.com>
> Well, thats a far cry from what Martin said. Since the primary > places SVG, for instance, uses IRIs is XLink (15 or so elements are > XLink simple links) and the other places are XML Base and ... erm, > can't think of any others, that means they are **all** LEIRI. Why does SVG need to talk about the LEIRIs in XLinks and xml:base attributes? (Rather than just talking about the XLinks and xml:base attributes themselves.) If it does, and refers to them as IRIs, it won't be any more or less wrong after XLink and XML Base switch to referring to LEIRIs, since they are *already* LEIRIs, just not so-named. -- Richard
Received on Monday, 17 March 2008 15:07:20 UTC