Hi Norm, please accept my late regrets. I'm at the XMLSec WG F2F in Barcelona and forgot to dial in. Konrad Norman Walsh schrieb: > | We had an XML Core WG phone call on Wednesday, July 16 > > Present: Norm, Henry, Daniel, Glenn > Regrets: Paul > > | Agenda > | ====== > | 1. Accepting the minutes from the last telcon [3] and > | the current task status [2] (have any questions, comments, > | or corrections ready by the beginning of the call). > > Accepted. > > | 2. Miscellaneous administrivia and document reviews. > | > | October Technical Plenary > | ------------------------- > | The next Technical Plenary is scheduled for October in Cannes: > | http://www.w3.org/2008/10/TPAC/Overview.html > | We have tentatively decided to meet there. > | > | The schedule is at: http://www.w3.org/2008/10/TPAC/Schedule.html > | XML Core meets Monday and Tuesday. > | > | Registration for the October TPAC2008: Combined Technical > | Plenary and Advisory Committee Meeting is now open at > | http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35125/TPAC2008/. > | Registration will close on 28 September, but the discount > | rate for hotel rooms will expire as of 8 September 2008. > | > | Probable attendees: Henry, Norm, Richard > | Quite unlikely: Glenn, Francois > | Uncertain: Konrad (but unlikely), John, Daniel, Paul > > Norm is considering not going to the Plenary. > > | 3. C14N 1.1 > | > | See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#c14n1.1 > | > | The C14N 1.1 Recommendation has been published at > | http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-c14n11-20080502/ > > Nothing new to report. > > | 4. XML 1.0 > | > | See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-errata > | > | The XML 1.0 5th Edition PER has been published at > | http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/PER-xml-20080205/ > | > | The PER period ended 16 May 2008. > | > | We need to have at least three implementations that > | pass the test suite for each of the errata that have > | been newly applied to the 5th Edition. > | > | A preliminary implementation report is at > | http://www.w3.org/XML/2008/01/xml10-5e-implementation > | > | ACTION to Richard, Henry: Add a test to the XML 1.0 5th Ed > | Test Suite about version=1.7 documents. > | > | A preliminary implementation report is at > | http://www.w3.org/XML/2008/01/xml10-5e-implementation > | > | ACTION to DV: Give update on status for implementing > | XML 1.0 5th Edition. > > Daniel is still trying to find the time. > > | ACTION to Glenn: Check with Apache folks on status of > | implementing XML 1.0 5th Edition. > > Glenn reports that there are any requests coming through the Apache > hierarchy for support. So they're waiting to see if someone is going > to place that requirement on Xerces. > > Henry will poke around in the I18N community looking for someone to > place that requirement. > > Norm wonders about the future, but I guess we won't get to to REC > before we have implementations, so maybe the risk (aside from the > delay) is low. > > Glenn wonders if there are other potential implementations. It would > be nice to have a major vendor parser. Maybe Woodstox? > > Henry notes that the other obvious possibility is a declared opponent. > Elliotte Rusty Harold is known to be opposed. > > | 5. XML 1.1 > | > | See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml1.1 > | > | XML 1.1 2nd Edition published 2006 August 16: > | > | Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.1 (Second Edition) > | http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml11-20060816 > > Nothing to report. > > | 6. XML Test Suite. > | > | See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-test-suite > | > | Henry/Richard discussed some test suite issues raised by Frans Englich: > | http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/ > | > | ACTION to Richard: Construct a test case for the XML test suite > | issues raised by Frans Englich: > | http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-testsuite/2007Mar/ > > Nothing to report. > > | 7. Namespaces in XML 1.0/1.1 > | > | See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.0 and > | http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#ns1.1. > | > | 2nd Editions published 2006 August 16: > | > | Namespaces in XML 1.0 (Second Edition) > | http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-names-20060816 > | > | Namespaces in XML 1.1 (Second Edition) > | http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-names11-20060816 > | > | Richard has partially updated the NS PE doc at > | http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2001/05/proposed-xml-names-errata.html > | > | ACTION to Richard: Fill in proposed resolutions for NPE27-30. > > Nothing to report. > > | 8. LEIRIs > | > | See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#leiri > | > | Paul's summary of what comes next spec-by-spec is at > | http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Dec/0045 > | > | Martin's latest IRI draft (defining LEIRIs in section 7) has > | expired; a copy is at > | http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-duerst-iri-bis-02 > | > | A summary of what specs need to be revised to reference LEIRIs is at > | http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2007Dec/0045 > | > | ACTION to Henry: Do some pinging about the schedule of IRI bis > | pointing out that having the IRI-bis draft expired is a serious > | problem for us. > > Henry reports that there is a visible RFC draft again. It's on the > agenda for I18N core to discuss as a matter of business. That's the > best we can do at this point: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2008JulSep/0000.html > > | 9. XML Base 2nd Edition 2nd PER > | > | See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xml-base > | > | The (second) XML Base (Second Edition) PER has been published at > | http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/PER-xmlbase-20080320/ > | and announced at > | http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2008JanMar/0112 > | > | The XML Base PER review period ended 30 June 2008. > | > | We have some comments in the comments list: > | http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2008AprJun/ > | 0003 > | http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2008AprJun/ > | 0011 > | http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2008AprJun/ > | 0012 > | > | We discussed the XHTML WG comment at > | http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2008AprJun/ > | 0011 > | a bit. > | > | The IRI-bis does allow x00-1F in LEIRIs, but such LEIRIs cannot > | be expressed in an XML document. The set of LEIRIs that can be > | expressed in an XML document is identical to what was always > | allowed in XML documents. See, for example: > | http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlbase/#escaping > | in XML Base 1.0. What we have in XML Base 1.1 is identical to > | what we allow in XML Base 1.0. > | > | ACTION to Norm: Respond to > | http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2008AprJun/ > | 0011 > | explaining ourselves and suggesting the additional of a > | clarificatory sentence. > > Norm did reply: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2008JulSep/0000.html > > Nothing has come back from Steven so far. > > ACTION: Richard to make the improvements we agreed to make to XML Base, namely > clarify the meaning of C0 controls and possibly add an example that uses an IRI. > > | ACTION to Richard: Review and suggest a response to > | http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2008AprJun/ > | 0003 > | and develop a DoC document. > | > | 10. XLink 1.1. > | > | See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xlink1.1 > | > | The earlier XLink CR was published at > | http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-xlink11-20060328/ > | > | The XLink 1.1 LC was published at > | http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-xlink11-20080331/ > | and announced at > | http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008Apr/0006 > | > | The LC review period ended 16 May 2008. > | > | Norm has prepared a DoC at > | http://www.w3.org/XML/2008/05/xlinklc/ > | > | ACTION to Henry: Continue to get the XSD for > | XLink at an accessible URI. > > Henry has made some progress, but needs more work. > > There's an open question about whether the XSD/DTD should default the > xlink:type attribute value. None of this effects our last call because > they're not normative. > > The discussion is now in email on the Core WG list. > > | John asked whether we should have two schemas, one for > | each of our conformance levels. > | > | ACTION to Henry, John: Think about having a basic level > | conformance XSD for XLink. > | > | Paul asks us to consider skipping CR and going directly to PR. > | > | ACTION to Henry: Review the history and make a recommendation > | as to whether we should skip CR and go directly to PR. > | > | Henry raised a question about the sample schemas at > | http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008Jul/0005 > > Actions continue. > > | 11. XInclude 3rd Edition > | > | See also http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude > | > | XInclude 2nd Edition is at: > | http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xinclude-20061115 > | > | See http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#xinclude for > | LEIRI-related changes for the 3rd Edition. > | > | ACTION to Daniel: Produce a PER-ready draft of XInclude 3rd Ed > | with appropriate references to the IRI RFC for LEIRIs. > > Action continues, Daniel will try to get it finished soon. > > | [1] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core > | [2] http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/Core#tasks > | [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2008Jul/0001 > > 12. Any other business? > > None heard. > Adjourned. > Be seeing you, > norm > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 16 July 2008 15:41:34 GMT